[EDITORS’ ADDRESS]
Sensus Historiae. OA Interdisciplinary Journal

Title of the paper: 

Review of the paper

Please provide individual justification for your negative evaluations and remarks.

No.	Question	Answer	
		Yes	No	Remarks	
1.	Does the paper qualify for publication?				
	–	without changes?				
	–	once significant changes have been made?				
2.	Is the the title appropriate and does it clearly describe the paper?				
3.	Does the volume of the paper match the rank of its content?				
		– Should the paper be shortened?				
		– Should the paper be expanded?				
4.	Does the paper introduce any elements of novelty?				
5.	Are the plan and organization of the paper correct?				
6.	Do the summary and abstract contain appropriate information?				
7.	Are the  illustrations clear and appropriately described?				
8.	Is the line of reasoning in the paper properly justified?				
9.	Is the proposed interpretation, explanation, or research properly documented?				
10.	Are the footnotes correct and not misleading to the reader?				
11.	Do the style and vocabulary conform to the requirements of academic writing?				
12.	Are the references chosen well and cited correctly?				

General evaluation

..........................................................					…….……………….………
(date, place)								(signature)
Please be aware that authors will receive a copy of the review without the name of the reviewer.